billyreedsays.com header image 1

Obama: Right Man, Right Place, Right Time

November 1st, 2008 by Billy Reed · 10 Comments

This year’s Presidential election is more important than most because never in our nation’s history has our government strayed as far from our fundamental American values as it has in the eight-year reign of George W. Bush and his Machiavellian Vice-President, Dick Cheney.

From President Bill Clinton they inherited a federal government that was at peace and held in high esteem by its friends around the world. They inherited a government that was serious about the environment, energy, and education. They inherited a government in which the economy thrived.

Piece by piece, they tore it down until, at the end, we have the most incredible mess any new administration has inherited since Franklin Delano Roosevelt was mercifully elected to replace the bumbling Herbert Hoover in 1932.

It was bad enough that through their propaganda ministers on right-wing radio, the Bush-Cheney gang got away with vilifying those who opposed them. They cynically wrapped themselves in the flag and their religion. In the most shameful display of demagoguery since the McCarthy era, they even perverted the language, redefining “Democrats” and “liberals” as being synonymous with “unpatriotic” and “anti-religious.”

Even worse, however, they betrayed the traditional conservative core beliefs of the Republican Party. From the days of Lincoln, Republicans have opposed big government, espoused fiscal responsibility, been wary of foreign entanglements, and supported every citizen’s constitutional rights.

But the Bush-Cheney gang – the ultimate “Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight” – abandoned those principles in favor of what the respected conservative pundit George Will calls “faux conservatism.” They grew the government, plunged the nation so deep in debt we may never dig out, invaded a sovereign nation that had not attacked us, flouted the rules of the Geneva Convention, and systematically tried to deprive Americans of our civil rights.

Whatever the Republican Party has become on the Bush-Cheney watch, it is not the G.O.P. of  Dwight D. Eisenhower, Everett Dirksen, John Sherman Cooper, Barry Goldwater, Gerald Ford, and Ronald Reagan.

Read the Rest After the Jump. . .

John McCain, the Republican nominee, knows this, but can acknowledge it in only a limited way. He has tried to distance himself from the Bush-Cheney gang while maintaining the support of their diehard followers, also cryptically known as “The Base.”

It has been a juggling act beyond McCain’s limited capability. For all his doubletalk about change, he has not pulled it off. The record is clear.He has voted with Bush almost every time and even bragged about it. He has said America should stay in Iraq 100 years, if that’s what it takes to win.

Of course, victory is impossible in Iraq, unless we engage in the doublespeak of Orwell’s “1984,” in which “War Is Peace!” and “Ignorance Is Strength!” It is, in fact, obscene to speak of victory when we already have lost more than 4,000 American lives, untold billions of dollars, and our hard-earned position as the world’s conscience.

But there’s hope. Thank God Almighty, there’s hope.

Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee, is a charismatic leader in the tradition of FDR, John F. Kennedy, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Bill Clinton, and, yes, Ronald Reagan. Even his most bitter opponents acknowledge, however grudgingly, his eloquence as a speaker. Of course, they also are quick to contend that he’s far more style than substance, one of the nicer things they’ve said about him during a campaign that has been ugly and dishonest even by Karl Rove’s standards.

The truth is, Obama could be the poster child for the Republican belief  that minorities should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. He has done that. When you examine Obama’s roots and his career path, he never enjoyed any of the advantages that belonged to McCain, the son and grandson of Navy admirals.

Obama also could the poster child for the Republican definition of family values. By all accounts, he’s a wonderful husband and father, a dedicated breadwinner, and a spiritual man who practices what he preaches. He also practices a healthy lifestyle, except for the cigarettes he sneaks.

Unable to find any dirt on him, and unwilling to stick to the issues, the neo-cons have employed various diversionary tactics, most notably the old guilt-by-association trick. They have spent an incredible amount of time, money, and energy talking about Obama’s past associations with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and William Ayers than about any of the critical issues confronting the nation.

Instead of promoting McCain in a positive way, his campaign handlers have opted for a negative strategy of attacking Obama. They have tried to play upon many Americans’ fear of the unknown by harping on what they perceive to be Obama’s lack of experience. They haven’t overtly played the race card; but they have tacitly wooed the rednecks who do not, under any circumstances, want an African-American to be President.

They have painted him as a “socialist” because he wants to find a way for all Americans to have quality health care and because he wants to change the tax structure in a way that will help young people just getting out of college and trying to start their own businesses. That was the message to “Joe the Plumber” that the McCain campaign distorted.

Perhaps most amazingly, they have drug out the old anti-intellectual stratagem that Eisenhower’s handlers used to defeat Adlai Stevenson twice in the 1950s. Like Obama, Stevenson was from Illinois. Also like Obama, he was an educated man of towering intellect. So the Republicans appealed to the Joe Sixpacks of that day by portraying him as an elitist “egghead” who was out of touch with the common man.

Through all this, remarkably, Obama has maintained his cool. His focus has never strayed from the issues. He has stayed on the high road, refusing to get down in the gutter. He has demonstrated, repeatedly, that he when it comes to race and religion, he believes in diversity, inclusion, and tolerance instead of just paying lip service to it.

Given the choice between talent or experience, almost any sports coach or manager will take talent every time. In Obama’s case, his talent is obvious and his potential unlimited. Although he’s almost three decades younger than McCain, he already has demonstrated that his judgment is far more reliable.

Consider, if you will, the judgment the candidates exercised when selecting their runningmates. Obama picked Joe Biden, a distinguished and respected veteran member of the U.S. Senate with special expertise in foreign policy. McCain picked Tina Fey – no, sorry, Sarah Palin. Both are comedians. It’s impossible to tell them apart, as McCain himself drove home by appearing with Fey-as-Palin on the most recent “Saturday Night Live.”

The more Palin has appeared in public, the more responsible Republicans – the spiritual descendants of Dirksen, Ford, et al – have become horrified by McCain’s hasty and irresponsible choice. Her vision of America coincides nicely with the Bush-Cheney crowd — you know, the charlatans and frauds from which we all agree that we need change.

Obama deserves your vote not just because he would be our first African-American President, although that, in itself, is not a bad reason to vote for him. He deserves your vote not just because he’s an eloquent and passionate speaker, although, heaven knows, it’s about time we had a leader who can inspire, uplift, and encourage us to seek the better angels of our nature.

He deserves your vote simply because he’s an exceptional human being who has something in common with just about every American, regardless of race, religion, or socio-economic status. He deserves your vote because he radiates intelligence, compassion, and common sense.

Finally, he deserves your vote because he has the vision and the will necessary to revive America’s pride in itself and restore us to our accustomed place as the moral leader in the community of nations.

More than any candidate we’ve seen since John F. Kennedy, Barack Obama is the right man with the right stuff at the right place at the right time. We can only devoutly hope that America gives him the opportunity to give us back our nation.

Tags: Politics

10 responses so far ↓

  • 1 kathy // Nov 3, 2008 at 7:09 am

    You are good at distorting the facts. The answer Mr. Obama gave Joe the Plumber was we want to “spread the wealth.” There was no mention of college students or of helping college students start businesses. You are like most democrats, good at distorting the truth. I hope you are still supporting Obama when he starts spreading your wealth around.

  • 2 David, Lexington // Nov 3, 2008 at 8:01 am

    There you go again Reed… why do you have no regard for truth! Nobamanation will become your and our nation’s worst nightmare if elected tomorrow!

  • 3 Nancy // Nov 3, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    Great arguments, Billy. I concur. I also believe that Obama represents an amazing opportunity for America to recover some of our lost reputation and to restore the middle class to the strength that will be needed to move our nation forward in a global environment. Obama is thoughtful, even-tempered, open to opposing ideas, willing to be challenged, compassionate and caring for the most vulnerable among us, and eager to serve as a reconciling force in our own politics and in world affairs. Thanks for an excellent blog entry.

  • 4 David // Nov 3, 2008 at 3:43 pm

    Billy,

    As I remember it when Clinton left the office the United States was a laughing stock due to Monicagate. Name a recent president who hasn’t increased the national debt. Do you really think Obama is going to balance the budget?

    Go Redskins!!!

  • 5 Charlie // Nov 3, 2008 at 4:01 pm

    One thing columnists should avoid is being predictable. I didn’t get past the first sentence.

  • 6 William // Nov 3, 2008 at 11:10 pm

    Could not agree more. I am 65 years old and never thought anyone could mess the country up like the Bush people have. From the national debt, the war, our international respect, everything they touched they messed up.

  • 7 kathy in kentucky // Nov 4, 2008 at 5:44 am

    I could not vote for a person who sat in a church that he supposedly attended twice a month for 20 years, but never heard the hate message preached by his pastor. I was young when the weather underground was founded and I remember the terror spread by this domestic terrorist group. I remember well the terror inspired by Arafat and I would not want to associate with a spokesperson of his. Louis Farrakhan is a known “Jew hater.” Obama’s church supposedly honored him with a special day. I would have to say that Obama does not under any circumstance deserve my vote. I will vote for the man who says proudly, “God bless America.”

  • 8 Verona Boy // Nov 4, 2008 at 8:11 am

    Why all the Palin-Hate, Billy? Is it her uttering the words “personal responsibilty” that upset you and the rest of the media so much? I am beginning to wonder if you just have woman issues.

  • 9 Nancy // Nov 4, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    Listen, Kathy in Kentucky: I personally know Jeremiah Wright and his church Trinity UCC is one of the strongest multiracial congregations in a predominantly white denomination. Wright’s 30 year ministry did more for the poor, the hungry, for kids on the street and in gangs, and for people in prison than any 20 other Chicago white churches. I never heard Jeremiah speak an unkind word to a person of another color. I never found him discourteous. You might want to listen to that ONE sermon all the way through. You might want to consider what it might feel like to be a member of the race that people considered disposable enough for the syphilis experiments at Tuskegee. He was a terrific preacher with a Ph.D. in Old Testament. As a white person, I would gladly listen to Jeremiah Wright for 20 years.

    And when pray tell did we ever have a candidate (other than Jimmy Carter) who attended church as often as Barack Obama. Mr. McCain certainly doesn’t attend church very much at all. I would rather have a person who goes to church be my president than one who only darkens the door when it is politically expedient.

    And one more thing: people attend churches for many more reasons than who the preacher is and what he says. They may, in fact, disagree with the preacher, but appreciate that he or she makes them think. They may have a community of friends in that church. They may find that church to be the avenue for their community service and their support network…all of which can be far more important than the preacher and what he or she says on any given Sunday morning.

  • 10 StevE l. // Nov 5, 2008 at 12:15 pm

    Billy, who are you going to blame for your pathetic, failure, loser life now that Bush is no longer around for you to hate.?

Leave a Comment